This was only to be expected. Several years ago Ofcom
announced that it would no longer be advertising any new local commercial radio
licences. The main reason given then was also that there are no suitable FM
frequencies vacant in the most populous areas of the UK.
It has always been the case that an alleged lack of
frequencies has been the excuse of choice used by successive governments and
regulators to justify rationing access to the airwaves. It was used to delay
the launch of BBC Radio One and local radio in the sixties, the launch of ILR
in the 1970s, and community radio for a long while thereafter. The laws of
physics have not changed in the intervening years, just the political will to
permit more stations to blossom, kicking the police transmitters out of the FM
broadcast band above 100 MHz for example permitted the introduction of national
and regional commercial services.
There now appear to be another couple of issues behind
Ofcom’s reluctance to allow any expansion of FM radio. Firstly the efforts of some in the industry
to promote DAB digital radio created the idea of a “digital switchover” for radio,
closing down the existing FM stations. I’m sure I’ll write more about this
shortly, but for now it’s sufficient to point out that there is no need for a
digital switchover date for radio as there was for terrestrial TV. In the case
of television the same UHF band was to be used for digital TV as had been used for
analogue channels since the launch of BBC2 in the 1960s. To make room for new
digital services the old analogue transmitters had to be closed, and this was
done in a planned and remarkably efficient fashion. By contrast, there is no immediate alternative
use for the FM radio band – it will not be used for DAB. Further there are a great deal more radio
receivers to replace in the average household than there were analogue TV sets –
for a long time people will be happy to keep using their FM radios. DAB has been called “a solution in search of
a problem”.
Secondly, Ofcom staff plainly feel overstretched. Compared
to the previous sector-specific regulator, the Radio Authority, the
communications watchdog has very few individuals dedicated to dealing with
radio broadcast issues. Decisions on radio licences are taken by a general
Broadcast Licensing Committee rather than the former dedicated and quite expert
Radio Licensing Committee. For a year or so until last summer the considerable
spectrum demands of the Olympics were often quoted as taking priority call over
staff time, then Ofcom’s political masters demanded a new focus - on local TV!
On 3 April 2012 the local radio licence for Slough, Windsor & Maidenhead, held by Time 106.6, was re-advertised, with a closing date for applications of 3 July. There were only two applicants, the incumbent and a local Asian community radio service. In the past major new licence awards, contested by up to half a dozen companies, have been decided in less than three months, but in this case the applicants (including the incumbent whose licence was due to run out in May) had to wait until 16 January this year – some six and a half months later – for the re-award to the existing licensee to be announced. Apologising for the delay one Ofcom official explained that the award decision was postponed until January because of the volume of business at the Broadcast Licensing Committee. In particular the BLC was required to give priority to awarding the new-fangled (and misconceived) local TV licences over dealing with these old local FM radio licences.
On 3 April 2012 the local radio licence for Slough, Windsor & Maidenhead, held by Time 106.6, was re-advertised, with a closing date for applications of 3 July. There were only two applicants, the incumbent and a local Asian community radio service. In the past major new licence awards, contested by up to half a dozen companies, have been decided in less than three months, but in this case the applicants (including the incumbent whose licence was due to run out in May) had to wait until 16 January this year – some six and a half months later – for the re-award to the existing licensee to be announced. Apologising for the delay one Ofcom official explained that the award decision was postponed until January because of the volume of business at the Broadcast Licensing Committee. In particular the BLC was required to give priority to awarding the new-fangled (and misconceived) local TV licences over dealing with these old local FM radio licences.
So is there really a frequency shortage? Or a shortage of
will at the DCMS and Ofcom?
Of course the FM band is limited in bandwidth and frequency
planning is a complex technical task if mutual interference is to be avoided.
For example two stations serving the same area must be spaced at least 0.4 MHz
apart. But the fact is that the allocation of FM band frequencies has been done
piecemeal over some sixty years and, were we starting with a blank sheet of
paper, we could be much more efficient in fitting in more stations. In particular the band has effectively been
carved up between the BBC and Ofcom with virtually all stations being allocated
frequencies only in the relevant sub-band. An example of the inefficiency of
this approach is that BBC Radio 2 transmitters have the frequencies between 88.1
and 90.2 MHz virtually all to themselves, as does BBC Radio 3 between 90.3 and
92.4 MHz, etc.. That’s more than 2 MHz of national bandwidth used to carry each
single BBC service. By contrast Classic FM achieves near-national coverage
using 2 MHz between 99.9 and 101.9 MHz, but, by careful Radio Authority planning,
it shares this sub-band with dozens of other local and regional stations.
Were the BBC national FM channels to be re-planned a large
number of lower-powered local transmitters could be interleaved between them,
even freeing other frequencies for further national commercial FM services.
These might be used for some of the quasi-national “regional” music stations
which currently sit on hundreds of separate local frequencies, creating more
opportunities.
But who is going to tell Ofcom this is a priority while we
are all supposed to be switching to DAB?
There are fm frequencies available for a commercial radio service for Teeside. The govenment and Ofcom are only interested in forcing broadcasters onto inferior and largely unwanted dab. I would suggest that Graham Robb or anyone else that was interested in running a radio service on Teeside resorted to piracy as the costs and penalties that may be incurred for doing so are vastly lower than the cost of dab!.
ReplyDelete